Advanced StatsĪltogether, Callahan had an 85.5 passer rating allowed. Skrine only had one, which is great compared to six the year prior. Lastly, Callahan did not have a single penalty in 2018. Callahan had five pass breakups in 2019, while Skrine had four in 2018 and three in 2019. He allowed 54 receptions for 630 yards and five touchdowns to no picks. Once again, those numbers were worse than Callahan, but better than his numbers in 2018. He allowed four touchdowns and zero interceptions. Skrine allowed 54 catches for 532 yards last year. Callahan allowed 39 receptions for 319 yards and one touchdown allowed to two picks. However, that is deeper down the field than Callahan who was targeted 5.7 yards downfield on average. His Average Depth of Target (ADOT) fell from 6.9 in New York to 6.6 in Chicago. Teams also attacked Skrine deeper down the field. Still, that does show that teams were more aggressive picking on Skrine than Callahan. Skrine was targeted 29.9% of the time in 2018, and that went down to 22.8% in 2019, according to player profiler. One of the biggest differences comes right off of the bat with Callahan seeing just 17.3% of the team’s targets. This article will look into the comparison between the two, as well as look at how Skrine did in comparison to his prior year stats. Still, in signing Buster Skrine to replace him, it is worth wondering what type of drop off the Bears saw at the position, if any, when moving from Callahan to Skrine. His injury never got better and he missed all of 2019. No matter how you debate it, the Chicago Bears made the right call letting Callahan walk. One of the biggest differences between the 2018 Chicago Bears and the 2019 version was Bryce Callahan.
What did the advanced stats say about Buster Skrine and his first season with the Chicago Bears?
0 kommentar(er)
